新旧版本《中国荷斯坦牛体型鉴定规程》对比分析

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.12.011

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 2414-2419.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.12.011

新旧版本《中国荷斯坦牛体型鉴定规程》对比分析

李想¹，鄢新义¹，曹露¹，田佳²，秦春华³，李委奇²，温万²，石万海⁴，张胜利¹，张沅¹，王雅春^1*

(1.中国农业大学，北京 100193； 2.宁夏回族自治区畜牧工作站，银川 750004；3.宁夏四正生物技术工程研究中心，银川 750200； 4.北京奶牛中心，北京 100085)

收稿日期:2016-07-25 出版日期:2016-12-23 发布日期:2016-12-23
通讯作者: 王雅春，E-mail：wangyachun@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:李想(1992-)，女，河南郑州人，硕士生，主要从事家畜遗传育种研究，E-mail：lixgs10@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
宁夏自治区农业育种专项-《优质高产奶牛育种》项目；现代农业（奶牛）产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-37）；长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT1191)

Comparative Analysis of Two Versions of Code of Practice of Type Classification in Chinese Holstein

LI Xiang¹, YAN Xin-yi¹, CAO Lu¹, TIAN Jia², QIN Chun-hua³, LI Wei-qi², WEN Wan², SHI Wan-hai⁴, ZHANG Sheng-li¹, ZHANG Yuan¹, WANG Ya-chun^1*

(1.China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2. The Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Animal Husbandry Station, Yinchuan 750004, China; 3. Ningxia Sygen Bio-engineering Research Center, Yinchuan 750200，China;4. Beijing Dairy Cattle Center, Beijing 100085, China)

Received:2016-07-25 Online:2016-12-23 Published:2016-12-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在比较分析新旧版本《中国荷斯坦牛体型鉴定规程》（以下简称《规程》）异同点，采用对比分析的方法，针对宁夏地区26个牛场的2 174头处于第一泌乳期的中国荷斯坦牛23个体型性状的单次评定记录,参照新旧版本《规程》的权重系统计算体躯容量、尻部、肢蹄、泌乳系统、乳用特征5个部位得分和综合得分并进行对比分析。结果表明：泌乳系统部位权重增加，乳用特征部位权重减少；新版《规程》综合得分范围增大，更能反映牛群中不同个体以及不同公牛女儿间的差异。综上表明，新版《规程》更适合中国群体，有利于提高遗传进展。

Abstract:

To compare and analyze the differences and similarities between two versions of Code of Practice of Type Classification in Chinese Holstein (use Code of Practice for short) , a total of 2 174 first lactation Holstein cows from 26 farms in Ningxia area were evaluated by 9-points type classification system. The weights from the two versions of Code of Practice were used to evaluate the score of 5 composites (Body size, rump, feet and legs, udder, dairy form) and type final score. The results showed that the weight of Udder was increased while the weight of Dairy Form was decreased. Compared with the final score derived from the old version, the range of final score from the new version was wider, which can explore the difference more efficiently among individuals within the population and difference among daughters from different bulls, respectively. The results conclude that the new version of Code of Practice can better fit to Chinese Holstein, and more beneficial to promote the genetic gain.

中图分类号:

李想，鄢新义，曹露，田佳，秦春华，李委奇，温万，石万海，张胜利，张沅，王雅春. 新旧版本《中国荷斯坦牛体型鉴定规程》对比分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(12): 2414-2419.

LI Xiang, YAN Xin-yi, CAO Lu, TIAN Jia, QIN Chun-hua, LI Wei-qi, WEN Wan, SHI Wan-hai, ZHANG Sheng-li, ZHANG Yuan, WANG Ya-chun. Comparative Analysis of Two Versions of Code of Practice of Type Classification in Chinese Holstein[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2016, 47(12): 2414-2419.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.12.011

https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/Y2016/V47/I12/2414

参考文献

［1］顾垚，刘光磊. 世界各国荷斯坦种公牛育种方法及选育方向的变化趋势［J］. 中国奶牛，2014(10): 17-21.
GU Y, LIU G L.The change trend of Holstein bull breeding and selection direction of the World［J］.China Dairy Cattle,2014(10): 17-21.(in Chinese)
［2］中国奶业协会. 中国荷斯坦牛体型外貌鉴定规程［M］. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006：1-18.
Dairy Association of China. Code of practice of type classification in Chinese Holstein［M］. Beijing:China Agriculture Press , 2006：1-18. (in Chinese)
［3］SAS INSTITUTE I. SAS/STAT user’s guide［S］. Version 9.2 ed., SAS Institute inc, Cary, NC, USA,7886, 2009.
［4］HOLSTEIN ASSOCIATION USA I. Linear Descriptive Traits［S］. PO Box 808, Brattleboro, VT05302-0808: Holstein Association USA,4, 2014.
［5］HOLSTEIN ASSOCIATION CANADA I. Classification［S］. Box 610 Brantford on Canada • N3T 5R4: Holstein Canada,10, 2014.
［6］程郁昕，方必春，高士宝，等. 淮南地区荷斯坦奶牛泌乳系统性状的线性评定及分析［J］. 中国草食动物， 2005(2): 12-14.
CHENG Y X,FANG B C,GAO S B, et al.Classification and analysis for mammary system traits in Holstein in huainan area［J］.China Herbivores,2005(2):12-14.(in Chinese)
［7］BOETTCHER P J, JAIRATH L K, KOOTS K R, et al. Effects of interactions between type and milk production on survival traits of Canadian Holsteins［J］. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 8011: 2984-2995.
［8］吴红超. 荷斯坦奶牛体型特征和功能寿命、305 d奶量、产犊间隔关系的研究［D］.泰安：山东农业大学, 2007.
WU H C. Relationships between body type score and FHL, 305-d milk, CI in Holstein cow［D］.Taian:Shandong Agricultural University, 2007.(in Chinese)
［9］付丰收，刘光磊. 2007-2011年上海DHI测试场奶牛体型外貌统计分析［Z］.第三届中国奶业大会，郑州：2012.
FU F S,LIU G L.Statistical analysis for type classification of dairy cattle in Shanghai DHI testing farms from 2007 to 2011［Z］. The 3th Dairy Conference of China,Zhengzhou: 2012.(in Chinese)
［10］王晓宁，王晓峰，李鹏，等. 荷斯坦奶牛体型线性鉴定分与淘汰率的关系［J］. 浙江农业科学. 2009(3): 608-610.
WANG X N,WANG X F,LI P, et al. Relationships between linear type classification scores and culling rate in Holstein［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2009(3):608-610. (in Chinese)
［11］VARGAS B, GROEN A F, HERRERO M, et al. Economic values for production and functional traits in Holstein cattle of Costa Rica［J］. Livestock Product Sci， 2002，75（2）：101-116.
［12］STOTT A W, VEERKAMP R F, WASSELL T R. The economics of fertility in the dairy herd.［J］. Anim Sci， 1999，68（1）：49-57.
［13］关龙. 中国荷斯坦牛体型性状遗传参数估计［D］. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2006.
GUAN L. Genetic parameter estimation for type traits in Chinese Holsteins［D］. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2006. (in Chinese)
［14］李培娟. 河北荷斯坦牛体型性状分析［D］. 邯郸：河北工程大学, 2010.
LI P J. Analysis of type traits of Holstein cattle in Hebei Province［D］. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2010. (in Chinese)
［15］刘松柏. 武汉地区荷斯坦牛体型线性性状的遗传分析［D］. 武汉：华中农业大学, 2008.
LIU S B. Genetic analysis for linear type traits of Holstein catttle in Wuhan［D］. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008.(in Chinese)

[1]	李建，宁静，陈西锐，宋成艳，雷安民. 小鼠H1foo基因四环素诱导表达系统的构建与表达[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2014, 45(5): 757-762.
[2]	吴正常，王靖，朱世平，赵乔辉，刘璐，訾臣，吴圣龙，包文斌. 猪BPI基因部分cSNPs检测及其对蛋白结构功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(7): 1000-1007.
[3]	左清清, 姚娜，董坤哲，叶绍辉，马月辉. 低氧适应的线粒体调控机制研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(7): 993-999.
[4]	刘青青，郑丽明，刘红亮，苏建民，权富生，张涌. 小鼠早期胚胎发育过程中的DNA去甲基化[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(4): 501-507.
[5]	齐超;谢岩;吴晓平;姜力;刘剑锋;孙东晓;张勤;张沅. 基于全基因组信息鉴定中国荷斯坦牛产奶性状基因及功能注释[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2012, 43(6): 872-877.

新旧版本《中国荷斯坦牛体型鉴定规程》对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Two Versions of Code of Practice of Type Classification in Chinese Holstein

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价